Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Shamlin v. Collier et al
as 1:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
Bobby R. Shamlin
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, John Werner and Wayne Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Werner
as 6:2016cv00294
Petitioner:
Thomas Raymond Carr
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Warden John Werner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Stephens et al
as 6:2016cv00162
Defendant:
FNU Adams, Bruce Armstrong, B. Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Stephens et al
as 1:2016cv00059
Defendant:
William Stephens and John Werner
Plaintiff:
Terry White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perkins v. State of Texas, Senate State Affairs Committee- Chairperson, Duncan et al
as 6:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Defendant:
State of Texas, Senate State Affairs Committee- Chairperson, Duncan, William Stephens and John Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Dunkin et al
as 4:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
Richard Wilson
Defendant:
Jeff Dunkin, Texas Department of Corrections and John Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Werner et al
as 4:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Donald Adkins
Defendant:
John Werner, Mary Karl, Damon Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v Andika et al
as 4:2013cv01424
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T Holloway
Defendant:
Eric Andika, John Werner, Cade Crippen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2012cv02619
Plaintiff:
Bruce Marshall
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2012cv01681
Plaintiff:
Jerome Harrell
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
