Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Disabilities Act of 1990
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanford v. Microsoft Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Stanford
Defendant:
Microsoft Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Warren v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jesse Joseph Warren
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Hoff v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Heather Davis, Anthony Holly and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Kabbenhoft et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Dave Kabbenhoft, Steve Foster, Joseph Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Joyce et al
as 1:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Joseph Joyce, M. Schuehr and Dave Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Foster et al
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Steve Foster, Justin Heidt, Brandon Gumke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Joyce et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Joseph Joyce, Becky Baumann, Morris Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laverdure et al v. Fargo, City of et al
as 3:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Bruce Joseph Laverdure and Danial Ray Curtis
Defendant:
Fargo, City of, Fargo City Inspector, Shawn Gorgdnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
