Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Jackson v. Warden Joseph Headly et al
as 2:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Olando Jackson and Burger
Defendant:
Warden Joseph Headly, Lt. Michael O. Calhoun, Lamar Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster, Sr. v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00874
Petitioner:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Joseph Headley, John Hamm, ADOC Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prince v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Petitioner:
Kevin Prince
Respondent:
Joseph Headley and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billingsley v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
United States of America, Baldwin, McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dwayne Aaron
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Joseph Headley, Correctional Officer Guise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Headley et al
as 5:2021cv01330
Petitioner:
Brian Andre Simpson
Respondent:
Joseph Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foster v. Headley et al
as 5:2021cv01061
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Foster
Respondent:
Joseph Headley and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'Quinn v. Dunn et al
as 5:2021cv00461
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Brewer, Warden Joseph Headley, Jeremy Pelzer and others
Plaintiff:
James O'Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00409
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Healithan, Correctional Officer Guise, Warden Joseph Headley and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dwayne Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2020cv01020
Defendant:
Steven T Marshall, Joseph Headley and Cullman, Alabama
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
