Cases 11 - 20 of 23
United States of America v. Stonebraker et al
as 5:2015cv04891
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alicia Marie Stonebraker, Paul Daniel Stonebraker, Kansas Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00595
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilkins v. Kansas Department of Labor
as 6:2012cv01363
Plaintiff:
Jack Wilkins
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Phillip Peavy v. Labor Source, et al
as 12-1566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Phillip A. Peavy
Defendant - Appellee:
Labor Source, American Building Maintenance, Kenrick C. Slipsager and others
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Labor and EEOC
Jaax v. Kansas Department of Labor
as 2:2011cv02521
Plaintiff:
Philip N. Jaax
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kiley et al v. Lord et al
as 2:2011cv02516
Plaintiff:
James E. Kiley, Jr. and Kiley Law Firm, LLC, The
Defendant:
Carol W. Lord, State of Kansas, The , Kansas Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfuetze v. State of Kansas, et al
as 10-3278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT PFUETZE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, WORKFORCE ALLIANCE OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS, MILDRED D. RICKS and others
Peavy v. Labor Source et al
as 4:2010cv01066
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Peavy
Defendant:
Labor Source, American Building Maintenance, Kansas Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
