Cases 11 - 20 of 30
SMITH et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff:
BREWSTER SMITH, JR , DORIS KIROUAC , CHRISTINA HAWKS and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION , BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE , BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOWERS et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00732
Plaintiff:
BURKE BOWERS , ROBERT SIMS , ERIK GAVIDIA and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION, BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE, BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2013mc00042
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC, ROSE MARKETING, LLC, DEPAOLA MARKETING, LLC and others
Hawkins v. Holmes et al
as 5:2013ct03025
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D. Hawkins
Defendant:
Joshua Holmes, Nathan McMillian, J. Herndon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. USA
as 5:2013cv00011
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tremayne Kendrick Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hammond v. USA
as 3:2013cv00023
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kendrick Omar Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. HP Enterprise Services
as 3:2012cv00859
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Davis
Defendant:
HP Enterprise Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Baham v. USA
as 2:2012cv00024
Petitioner:
Kendrick Baham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cooke et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012ct03020
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Ike Eichenlaub and others
Plaintiff:
Randle Cooke and Kendrick Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baham v. USA
as 2:2012cv00003
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kendrick Baham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
