Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Foster et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2018cv10354
Plaintiff:
Stacy Foster , Jamie Kimball and Jonathan Riley
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Charlie Baker, Deborah B. Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Keefe et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2017cv12015
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Joseph O'Keefe and Priscilla A. O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coote v. Keefe
as 1:2017cv11474
Defendant:
Patrick Keefe
Plaintiff:
Marvin Coote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfield et al v. Town of Andover et al
as 1:2017cv11051
Plaintiff:
Marie Winfield and Robert Winfield
Defendant:
Town of Andover , Christopher Hughes , Sobahn Namvar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC v. Keefe et al
as 1:2016cv12288
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC
Defendant:
David Keefe and Joseph Canavan
Counter_claimant:
David Keefe
Counter_defendant:
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fone et al v. Brito et al
as 1:2016cv11508
Plaintiff:
Donald Fone , Deanne Fone and Donna Keefe
Defendant:
Danny Brito , Corey Erickson , FNU Prescott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Keefe v. USA
as 1:2016cv11358
Petitioner:
Wayne O'Keefe
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Riley v. Higgins O'Brien et al
as 1:2016cv11064
Plaintiff:
Cleon Riley
Defendant:
Carol Higgins O'Brien, Lois Russo, William Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellerbe v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2016cv10224
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ellerbe
Defendant:
Carol Higgins O'Brien, Russo, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Higgins O'Brien
as 1:2016cv10058
Plaintiff:
George Johnson
Defendant:
Carol Higgins O'Brien, Jane Doe (Russo), Superintendent (MCI) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
