Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Warner et al v. Gross et al
as 5:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
Charles F Warner , James A Coddington , Benjamin R Cole and others
Defendant:
Kevin J Gross , Michael W Roach , Steve Burrage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Lawton Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2014cv00510
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Lawton Correctional Facility, Hector Rios and Captain Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Wilkerson
as 4:2013cv00234
Petitioner:
Kendrick Arnez Moore
Respondent:
Tim Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Delaware County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lucretia Jo White
Defendant:
Delaware County Sheriff's Office, John Brantley, Candy Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Simpson v. Workman
as 5:2011cv00096
Petitioner:
Kendrick Antonio Simpson
Respondent:
Randall G Workman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Citty et al
as 5:2010cv01330
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Wilson
Defendant:
Bill Citty , Oklahoma City, City of , Matthew McRorie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Downing v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Downing
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Fulton v. Ledezma
as 5:2008cv00945
Petitioner:
Kendrick Jermaine Fulton
Respondent:
H A Ledezma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murray v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2007cv01404
Plaintiff:
John R Murray
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Brad Henry, Andrea Collum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
