Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Pearson v. Commonweath of Virginia et al
as 3:2019cv00952
Defendant:
Chesterfield County and Commonweath of Virginia
Plaintiff:
Adam Kurt Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
K2 Group, Inc. v. K2 Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
K2 Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Kurt S Kushner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Haneiph v. USA
as 1:2016cv00780
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kurt Shawn Haneiph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mueller v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO) et al
as 1:2015cv00847
Plaintiff:
Kurt Mueller
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO), Michelle K. Lee and Margaret A. (Peggy) Focarino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Westerfield v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2013cv01206
Petitioner:
Kurt Westerfield
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TEC of Knoxville, LLC v. Anderson et al
as 3:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
TEC of Knoxville, LLC
Defendant:
Robert Kurt Anderson and Car Wash Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Reighard v. USA
as 1:2013cv00087
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kurt Reighard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davenport et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2012cv00710
Plaintiff:
Donald Davenport , Montague Agee , Michael Alston and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mueller v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2012cv00632
Plaintiff:
Kurt Mueller
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, Jonathan Jarvis, Karen Pittleman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
