Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Bank of America, N.A. v. Harris et al
as 1:2017cv01201
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
James L. Harris, Stephen Young, Tommie L. Lowery, Jr. and others
Cross_claimant:
Branch Banking & Trust Co.
Cross_defendant:
Jermani Nance, James L. Harris, JN Enterprises, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Branch Banking & Trust Co.
Counter_defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Reynolds v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 5:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Janssen Reynolds
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Coffee Correctional Facility, Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 1:2016cv03059
Plaintiff:
Janssen Reynolds
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Coffee Correctional Facility, Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2014cv03548
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. Harris
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00231
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Harris
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv02045
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. ALBANY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
R. L. HARRIS
Defendant:
GARNETT LINCEY, EARNEST THOMPSON and MICHEAL PRESSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyer v. Medlin et al
as 3:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Dyer
Defendant:
Jason Medlin, Jerry Miles, FNU Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
