Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Coleman v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2014cv05508
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Coleman
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeffrey Beard, Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Thomas Flowers et al v. Doctor's Best Inc
as 2:2013cv08174
Defendant:
Doctor's Best Inc
Plaintiff:
Thomas Flowers and Christopher L Nelson
Cohea v. Carron et al
as 1:2013cv01061
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
Yossi Carron, L. Nelson, D. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickinson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01199
Plaintiff:
William E. Dickinson , Larry . Anderson , Verne R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamon v. Amrheign et al
as 1:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
B. Amrheign, Austin, Brad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv06715
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 3:2011cv06715
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James A Nelson et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 8:2011cv01353
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Does and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Plaintiff:
James A Nelson and Sherrie L Nelson
Lamon v. Amrhein, et al.
as 1:2011cv00615
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
B Amrhein, Austin, Brad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.