Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Smith v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Jason L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mayfield et al v. City of College Station
as 4:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
Helen Tyne Mayfield and James Campbell
Defendant:
City of College Station, City of Bryan, Brazos County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Tabor Store, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
The Tabor Store, LLC d/b/a The Tabor Store, Jayme E. Smith, Alan L. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Alamo Oilfield Services LLC et al
as 5:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Smith
Defendant:
Alamo Oilfield Services LLC and David Pena
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Santoyo et al
as 3:2022cv01911
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Guillermo Santoyo, Jr, Joel Gonzalez, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dunn v. Smith
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Edrick Dunn
Defendant:
Sara L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grizzle v. Mcintire et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Bryson Mcintire, Madison Hendricks, Lindsay Hummel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenewinkel v. Carajal et al
as 3:2021cv02524
Plaintiff:
Jay E Glenewinkel
Defendant:
NFN Carajal, J D Allen, K Zook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
