Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Johns v. Morris et al
as 5:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Bryan J Johns
Defendant:
William F Morris, III, Doris Morris, Randy Clapsadl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Gaillard v. Odham et al
as 5:2023ct03154
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gaillard
Defendant:
Jeffrey Odham, Lewis B. Leonard, P. Robinett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gravel v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Leonard Albert Gravel
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
THOMAS-BEY v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS-BEY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02006
Petitioner:
James Leonard Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leonard v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Sandra Leonard
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Houston v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. Houston
Defendant:
United States of America
TRUESDALE v TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adaesha Truesdale, ALFRED ALLISON, ALICIA BOWE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TMX Finance of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wayne Ingram
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
THOMAS v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
