Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lewis v. Doying et al
as 2:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
James Lewis
Defendant:
CO Denice Doying, CO Briggs, Lt Osgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
John G Lewis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis, Raymond v. Gonzalez, Ramona et al
as 3:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Lewis
Defendant:
Ramona Gonzalez, District Attorney Tim Gruenke and James Mancuso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. River North Transit LLC
as 2:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lewis
Defendant:
River North Transit, LLC and River North Transit LLC doing business as Via Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lewis v. Guthrie et al
as 2:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
James Arnold Lewis
Defendant:
Ms Guthrie, Ms White and Christian Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Wudtke et al
as 1:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lewis
Defendant:
Joline L Wudtke and K Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis, Jason v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00223
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Lewis
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. US District Court Southern District Indiana Indianapolis
as 2:2023cv00421
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Lewis
Respondent:
US District Court Southern District of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lewis, Sr., Charles et al v. Columbia County et al
as 3:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Charles Lewis, Sr. and Marianne Lewis
Defendant:
Columbia County, Matthias Elson and Travis Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
