Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022cv05059
Plaintiff:
Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones, Rayna Moses and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
(PC) Underwood v. Mayes
as 2:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Errol Lovell Underwood
Defendant:
Robert Mayes and CCHCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Lovell Colvin
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christine Miller v. Graysoh Jordan et al
as 2:2021cv08185
Plaintiff:
Christine Miller
Defendant:
Grayson Jordan, Lovelle Fuhrman-Jordan and Ivy Merlo
Chapman v. Melton et al
as 3:2021cv03931
Defendant:
V. Minglana, F. Vasquez, R. Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Lovelle Marquis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Bos v. Grissom et al
as 2:2018cv02976
Plaintiff:
Tamara L. Bos
Defendant:
Carla Donaldson, US Department of the Treasury Offset, US Small Business Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APL Co. Pte Ltd v. Secure Freight Systems USA Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06473
Plaintiff:
APL Co. Pte Ltd
Defendant:
Secure Freight Systems (USA) Inc., Andplastic Trade Co. Ltd., Lovell Recycling Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeBose v. Madden
as 3:2020cv01132
Petitioner:
Louis Lovell DeBose
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Lovell v. McDowell
as 2:2020cv00194
Respondent:
N. McDowell
Petitioner:
David Anthony Lovell, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
