Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Benavides v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2009cv02468
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Benavides
Defendant:
Mary Mitchell and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Avila v. Lappin et al
as 4:2009cv02414
Plaintiff:
Primitivo Avila
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, Michael Mukasey, Dan Joslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Riffey v. Lappin et al
as 6:2009cv02089
Plaintiff:
William L Riffey
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, ML Rivera, Robert Giorno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Riffey v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv02089
Plaintiff:
William L Riffey
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin , ML Rivera , Robert Giorno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIFFEY v. LAPPIN
as 6:2009cv01873
Petitioner:
WILLIAM L. RIFFEY
Respondent:
Harley G Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jackson v. Lappin et al
as 9:2009cv01797
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin and M L Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Lucas v. Rivera et al
as 1:2008cv04051
Plaintiff:
Dean Lucas
Defendant:
M L Rivera , US Attorney for the District of South Carolina , Attorney General of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Pettiford et al
as 0:2008cv03594
Plaintiff:
Edwin Jay Randall
Defendant:
Michael Pettiford, J Comstock, Darlene Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Lappin
as 6:2008cv01167
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flanigan v. United States et al
as 8:2008cv00941
Plaintiff:
Michael Brunell Flanigan
Defendant:
United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Rex Blocker and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
