Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Nike, Inc. et al v. Wu
as 1:2013cv08012
Defendant:
Martin Lessmann, Ming Yuan Mao Yi You Xian Gong Si, Ming Fang and others
Plaintiff:
Converse Inc., Nike, Inc. and Assignee Next Investments, LLC
Interested Party:
Next Investments, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Bank of Communications, China Merchants Bank, China Construction Bank and others
Debtor In Possession:
Zhan Ruping
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Berg v. Ayesh et al
as 6:2013cv01164
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Berg
Defendant:
Mark G. Ayesh , Simon Palmer Properties, Inc. , Cedar Lakes Village Condominium Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Christian v. Rhodes, et al
as 12-6221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANAEL SCOTT CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY RHODES and JIM MULLET
Rhodes v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Larry Rhodes
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Looney v. Rhodes et al
as 5:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Brandon Christopher Looney
Defendant:
Larry Rhodes and Jim Mullet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Rhodes et al
as 5:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Baker
Defendant:
Larry Rhodes and Jim Mullet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Rhodes et al
as 5:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Scott Christian
Defendant:
Larry Rhodes and Jim Mullet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skibo v. Rhodes et al
as 5:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryan Skibo
Defendant:
Larry Rhodes and Jim Mullet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Hampson et al
as 5:2010cv00184
Plaintiff:
Larry Rhodes
Defendant:
William Hampson and Coast to Coast Drive-A-Way Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Jackson v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2009cv00267
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jackson
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, Virgil Lucas, Larry Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
