Cases 11 - 20 of 23
CHASE v. MERSON et al
as 2:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
JOHN F CHASE
Defendant:
ARTHUR MERSON, ENDEAVOR PROJECT CONSULTANTS LLC, CHRISTOPHER M OCHOA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MORRELL v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER MORRELL
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BICKFORD v. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL S HAENN
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
KERRI BICKFORD
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL S HAENN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WALKER v. LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF PC
as 2:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
PAMELA WALKER
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF PC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HURT v. FERGUSON, MISSOURI et al
as 1:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
FERGUSON, MISSOURI, STATE OF MISSOURI, UNKNOWN NARCOTICS AGENT (1972) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: SEAN FARRIS AND FARRIS LAW
as 1:2013mc00183
Movant:
SEAN FARRIS and FARRIS LAW
Respondent:
CAROLE SWAN
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC v. KELIHER et al
as 1:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC
Defendant:
PATRICK KELIHER and CHANDLER E WOODCOCK
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC v. US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC
Defendant:
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, LISA P JACKSON and H CURTIS SPALDING
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
JONES v. TEXAS TDCJ ID ADMINISTRATION, et al
as 2:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant:
TEXAS TDCJ ID ADMINISTRATION, TEXAS ENTIRE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, TEXAS 1996-2012 ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
