Cases 11 - 20 of 234
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen, Montana Board of Pardons and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Sellers et al
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lee Bennett
Defendant:
Christina Sellers, SB RN, UT RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen and Brian Gootkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, C/O Teegan, Dr. Jauch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Kowalski et al
as 6:2023cv00039
Petitioner:
Travis Lee Owens
Respondent:
Jason Kowalski and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MadPlume v. Lake County Montana
as 9:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee MadPlume, Jr.
Respondent:
Lake County Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopkins v. C/O Childress et al
as 4:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Hopkins
Defendant:
C/O Childress, C/O Combs, Corporal Loomis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. C/O Webb et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Hopkins
Respondent:
C/O Webb, Sgt. Millard, Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In Re McCann
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Frankie Lee McCann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Held v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Held and Brenda-Lee Held
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte, Austin Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
