Cases 11 - 20 of 1,894
Doe #063 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Doe #063
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #064 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Doe #064
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #065 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
John Doe #065
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Joe Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTSON v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LASHEA ROBERTSON and Ronnie Lashea Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Anthony Alexander, Mayor Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Skrmetti et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Rex Allen Moore
Defendant:
Jonathan Skrmetti, T.D.O.C./B.O.P.P., Johnny Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watts v. Juvenile Defender's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02280
Plaintiff:
Roger Watts
Defendant:
Juvenile Defender's Office, Mayor Lee Harris and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Alexander v. Washington County et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Philemon Alexander
Defendant:
Washington County, B. Jenkins, Ruipert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
