Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Wise v. City of Aberdeen, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
George Arthur Wise
Defendant:
City of Aberdeen, Mississippi and Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Lewis
as 3:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Darile Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartley et al v. Freese & Goss, et al
as 3:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Hartley , Minnie Copeland , Hazel Thigpen and others
Defendant:
Freese & Goss, PLLC , Richard A. Freese , Dennis C. Sweet, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. U.S. Government et al
as 5:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Darile Lee Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Government and Social Security Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Conner et al
as 3:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Artez L. Richardson
Defendant:
Margaret Conner, Jerry Edwards, Jr., Tony Lee Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
Darile Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis, Chris Picou and Michael Ivy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Alexander
as 4:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Rachel Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bavetta et al
as 4:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Marsha Bavetta, Patick Burt, Donnie Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
as 3:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Antoino M. Adams, All Plaintiffs, James C. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Alexander et al
as 4:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Rachel Alexander, Police Department of Philadelphia Mississippi and Sheriff Department of Philadelphia, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
