Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Clark v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
Arthur Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Sgt. Ligon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington, et al v. Ana P. Hall Construction, L.L.C., et al
as 2:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Walter Arrington, III , Danita Brown , Lyndon Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Ana P. Hall Construction, L.L.C. , Ana Paula Olinquevi Hall , De Angelo De Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swain v. Mason et al
as 2:2012cv03757
Plaintiff:
Willie Swain
Defendant:
Mason, Jones, Blue and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Randy King
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , M. Foster , A. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ligon v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 3:2011cv03481
Plaintiff:
Robert Ligon
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ligon v. The Alabama Department of Corrections, Classification Division (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv01093
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Ligon
Defendant:
The Alabama Department of Corrections, Classification Division , Dawn McRae and Rebecca Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hornsby et al v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00680
Plaintiff:
Lucretia Hornsby , Anmarie Young , Preston Young and others
Defendant:
Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dillard, et al. v. Crenshaw County, AL, et al
as 2:1985cv01332
Plaintiff:
John Dillard, et al.
Defendant:
Crenshaw County, Alabama, Ira Thompson Harbin, Jerry L. Register and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
