Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lockhart v. Reese et al
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Marquise Lockhart
Defendant:
Cynthia Reese, Unknown Hancock, Unknown Vandergriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01156
Plaintiff:
Mary Moore , Kenneth Wells , Deborah Currie and others
Defendant:
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. , Daiichi Sankyo US Holdings, Inc. , Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Betts v. Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Betts
Defendant:
Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Campbell et al
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Cooley
Defendant:
Gary Campbell, Elizabeth Conley, Michael Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. USA
as 3:2013cv05124
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Lockhart
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Waggoner et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2013cv01349
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Waggoner and Neta Pillard Kessler
Defendant:
State of Missouri , Missouri Department of Family Services , Lincoln County, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lockhart v. Colvin
as 6:2013cv03151
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Harold Glenn Lockhart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jordan et al v. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00098
Defendant:
St. Louis Post-Dispatch, LLC , Kevin Mowbray and Astrid Garcia
Plaintiff:
Rayburn A. Jordan , Melinda Krummrich , Mary Delach Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lockhart v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2010cv02434
Plaintiff:
Steve Lockhart
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
