Cases 11 - 20 of 421
COFIELD v. LONG et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
RANDY EUGENE COFIELD
Defendant:
SHERIFF GARY LONG, SHAUN SOUTHERLAND, DENISE WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv05595
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Clark
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department, Kebo Taylor, J. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
MATTHEWS v. LONG
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
GLEN SPEARING MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ROBERT R LONG, HARRY J FOX, JR, JOHN FRANCISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Atlanta Police Department
as 1:2023cv05603
Plaintiff:
Antonio Long
Defendant:
Atlanta Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
IN RE: ARC Airbag Inflators Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2022md03051
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mann, Jimmy Mann, Richard Topa and others
Defendant:
Arc Automotive, Inc., General Motors LLC, Kia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Mathis v. Reynolds
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Ken Mathis
Defendant:
Frank Reynolds, Donald E. Craig, Major Christine Scurry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clowers v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv04681
Plaintiff:
Tanika Clowers
Defendant:
Derrick Long and And All Others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
