Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Jones v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv03327
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Jones
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dunleavy et al v. Gill-Simpson, Inc.
as 1:2014mc00431
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Dunleavy, James J. Ferry, II, James W. Gloekler and others
Defendant:
Gill-Simpson, Inc.
City of Annapolis v. Bowen, Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv02558
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis
Defendant:
Edgar A Bowen, Jr., Kenneth S Ashton, Gene Craig Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Taylor v. Gibson, Jones & Assoc, LLP et al
as 8:2013cv01343
Plaintiff:
Telvon M. Taylor
Defendant:
Gibson, Jones & Assoc, LLP and Antoini M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berterman et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2011cv02489
Plaintiff:
Marie Berterman , Charles Ray Buckland and Charles Lee Buckland
Defendant:
Irvin M. Jones , Irvin Jones Trucking, LLC , J & J Auto Repair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burson et al v. Jones
as 1:2010cv00446
Plaintiff:
John S. Burson, John S. Burson, John S. Burson and others
Defendant:
Lynette M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv02314
Plaintiff:
Benita M. Jones
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue, Rod J. Rosenstein and Eric H. Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Kenny v. Jones et al
as 8:2007cv02421
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kenny
Defendant:
M. Jones, Estime and Washington Metro Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Variety Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv01742
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Allen
Defendant:
Variety Stores, Inc., Variety Wholesalers, Inc., Walter M. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
