Cases 11 - 20 of 22
MACKIE v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2019cv01388
Petitioner:
JAMES MACKIE, JR.
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BALASSIS v. MACKIE
as 2:2015cv02960
Plaintiff:
MARINA BALASSIS
Defendant:
KYLE MACKIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MACKIE v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04880
Petitioner:
ERIC MACKIE
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANTA v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2013cv05579
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANTA
Defendant:
HOMER BROOKS, ANTHONY BROWN, ANTHONY GLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOONE v. NOSE et al
as 2:2012cv01370
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEON BOONE
Defendant:
NOSE, MACKY, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MACKIE et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65067
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR J MACKIE, JR and MARY F MACKIE
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLAIN v. CLARK et al
as 2:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
RANDY CLARK, JAMES ASCENCIO, BURTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60812
Plaintiff:
ALFONSON RAMIREZ, JR. and MACKIE GENELL RAMIREZ
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , MINNESOTA MINING & MFG., CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
