Cases 11 - 20 of 27
VISCONTI v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT, JESUS BERNAL, SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Albert Gregory Pinto v. Maha Visconti et al
as 2:2023cv06078
Plaintiff:
Albert Gregory Pinto
Defendant:
Maha Visconti and Does 1-25
Cross Claimant:
MAHA VISCONTI (EL Moqaddem)
Cross Defendant:
Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lala Maha Visconti v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Lala Maha Visconti
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert Gregory Pinto v. Maha Visconti Moquddem
as 2:2023cv02090
Plaintiff:
Albert Gregory Pinto
Defendant:
Maha Visconti Moqaddem
Cross Claimant:
Maha Maqaddem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
VISCONTI v. Kalra et al
as 5:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
Upinder S Kalra, Judge Lauren Weis Birnstein, JUDGE MARK E WINDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
VISCONTI v. Kalra et al
as 5:2022cv02123
Plaintiff:
The victim MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
Judge Upinder Kalra, Judge Lauren Weis Birnstein, District attorney office of Los Angeles County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
VISCONTI v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2016cv01852
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CITIBANK NA, CITIGROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Visconti v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv00453
Plaintiff:
Maha Visconti
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Visconti v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. et al
as 1:2016cv00452
Plaintiff:
Maha Visconti
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. and Home Equity Department of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
