Cases 11 - 20 of 22
MARTIN v. ARNOLD et al
as 2:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ARNOLD, MARK SMITH JR, ASHBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, THOMAS WELLINGTON, T. TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTHOPER HOLCOMB, VARTHEL, RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. WELLINGTON et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
THOMAS WELLINGTON, WILMORE, CARPETTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. DONOVAN et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
NICHOLAS DONOVAN, MARK SMITH, ADAM JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IRBY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK IRBY
Defendant:
MARK SMITH and ALICIA S. MIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
SONNY DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv02846
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MARK SMITH and SUSIE SMITH
Unknown:
Thomas Aaron Stringer and Thomas Aaron Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
