Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 326
TEAGUE et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01895
Plaintiff: MARY ANNE TEAGUE and EDDIE EUGENE TEAGUE
Defendant: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS HOLDING USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANE et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04823
Plaintiff: MARY ANN BANE and DANIEL BANE
Defendant: MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01374
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BELL v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04331
Plaintiff: MARY ANN BELL
Defendant: MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03329
Plaintiff: MARY ANN YOUNG
Defendant: LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. ODEM
as 2:2021cv00973
Plaintiff: STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant: JUDGE MARY ANN ODEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03078
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CHAPMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00062
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: MARY ANN CHAPMAN
GLOVER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2021cv01644
Plaintiff: CARLOW GLOVER and CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant: MARY ANN SWIFT, P/O/ KEITH QUICK, P/O CPL. W SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRETT et al v. SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
as 2:2021cv01428
Plaintiff: DAVID BARRETT and MARY ANN BARRETT
Defendant: SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?