Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Bey v. Rieck et al
as 2:2021cv00567
Defendant:
Michael P Maxwell and Daniel J Rieck
Plaintiff:
Zubiya Najiha Najma Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puchner v. Puchner et al
as 2:2021cv00041
Defendant:
Honorable Maxwell and Marya L Puchner
Plaintiff:
John D Puchner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagler v. Heitman et al
as 2:2020cv00973
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Bernard Hagler
Defendant:
Hattie E Williams, Daniel Sturma, Arturo Burgos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell et al v. Outagamie County et al
as 2:2020cv00386
Plaintiff:
Estate of William Maxwell and Andrea Laakso Maxwell
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Fay Geenan, Ann Gorski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mecum Auction Inc. v. Smith et al
as 2:2019cv01507
Defendant:
Maxwell Wilson and Vernon Smith
Plaintiff:
Mecum Auction Inc. and Mecum Auction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nash, Robert v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2019cv00737
Defendant:
Supervisor Brandy Maxwell, Youth Counsellor Mr. Lavicis, John/Jane Does #1 through #___ and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Nash, Jr.
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00753
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maxwell
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nash, Robert v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2019cv00388
Defendant:
Supervisor Brandy Maxwell, Youth Counsellor Mr. Lavicis, Scott Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Nash, Jr.
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cranberry Growers Cooperative v. Maxwell Food Products Pty. Ltd.
as 3:2019cv00100
Plaintiff:
Cranberry Growers Cooperative
Defendant:
Maxwell Food Products Pty. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00538
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
