Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Gibbs et al v. State of Tennessee et al (JRG2)
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Gibbs, Jr., Adria P. Gibbs-Hines, Myra A. Collier and others
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Hamilton County, Hamilton County Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Harvile et al
as 2:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Dean Scott McPherson, Jr.
Defendant:
James Harvile, Chris Harvile and Jesse Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Bryant et al
as 2:2016cv02107
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin and Michael Anthony McPherson
Defendant:
William Bryant, Stanley Dickerson, James Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes et al v. McPherson et al
as 1:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Haynes and Johnathon Haynes
Defendant:
Michael McPherson and C.R. England
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McPherson v. Kwok-Lee et al
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Sarah A. McPherson
Defendant:
Michelle Kwok-Lee and Ronald Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Doll et al
as 1:2014cv01338
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann McPherson
Defendant:
John J. Doll, Eugene Quinn, Richard C. Litman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Hewitt et al
as 1:2014cv01262
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann McPherson
Defendant:
Lester L. Hewitt, The Estate of Howard Roy Berkenstock, Jr., Paul Edward Krieger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Bupp et al
as 1:2014cv01200
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann McPherson
Defendant:
Heather Bupp, Jonathon Ward Dudas and David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Wenzel et al
as 1:2014cv01156
Plaintiff:
Sarah A. McPherson
Defendant:
John Remon Wenzel, Richard Curtis Litman, Peter Loffler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
