Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Bennett v. Taylor et al
as 2:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Sharon Taylor, Captain Lee, Shannon Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Hayworth et al
as 2:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Eileen Hayworth, Sharon Taylor, Christopher Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Jesse Gregg, Roger Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bolletino v. Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bolletino, William Love, III, Sandra Fite and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith et al v. Qualls et al
as 1:2011cv01389
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith , LaDonna Smith , Me. Smith and others
Defendant:
Carolyn Qualls and ACME Pest Management, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Kathy Blount
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Erachem Comilog, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00635
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Erachem Comilog, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02296
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Smith v. USA
as 3:2008cv00502
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael - Smith
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith et al v. Alabama Sling Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02698
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith and Patricia Smith
Defendant:
Alabama Sling Center, Inc., Alabama Sling Center, Inc., Alabama Sling Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
