Cases 11 - 20 of 41
XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2020cv07480
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, cruinne, Fang Qiu Trading Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MIKUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13226
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN D MIKUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcus Rosser v. Thomas Donovan, et al
as 20-3278
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC CHRISTOPHER, TIMOTHY COLLINS, DETECTIVE THOMAS ORZECHOWSKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS ROSSER
Mikus v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00065
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Mikus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GOK v. POST & SCHELL PC et al
as 2:2020cv04968
Defendant:
JUSTIN SWIDLER, DEREK SMITH LAW GROUP, PLLC, MATTHEW WEISBERG and others
Plaintiff:
HAYRIYE BERIL GOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOK v. ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH et al
as 2:2020cv04817
Plaintiff:
HAYIRYE BERIL GOK
Defendant:
OLEG TEYTELBOYM, ALAN J DAVIS, CATHY MIKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DENICHOLAS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv11226
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SUSAN DENICHOLAS and THE ESTATE OF MARIE E. MIKUS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wei v. Miku Sushi Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05667
Plaintiff:
Hsiao Jean Wei
Defendant:
Miku Sushi Inc. and Yi Fang Chen
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7434
MIKUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02673
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MIKUS
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
