Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Duke v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2016at00985
Plaintiff:
Mark Duke
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and EMS Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hairston et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
Henry Hairston , Christopher Walker , Richard Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2016cv00424
Defendant:
Alamo Heights Police Dept., FNU De La Rosa, Nicolas LaHood and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2016cv00385
Respondent:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center and Susan Pamerleau
Petitioner:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lindsey et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Lindsey , Albert Jones , Brian Margulis and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2015cv00937
Defendant:
Alamo Heights Police Dept., Bexar County Sheriff's Department, L. De La Rosa and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Mark Duke
as 15-13803
Petitioner:
In re: MARK DUKE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Duke v. Dunn
as 2:2015cv01462
Petitioner:
Mark Duke
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dukes v. Olivarri et al
as 5:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Defendant:
Nicholas LaHood, Ray J. Olivarri and Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
