Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Todd v. Faughn et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Tylenn Jamar Todd
Defendant:
Brodie Faughn, Mark Duke, Austin Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUKE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2020cv02207
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MARK DUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duke et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
Barbara Duke and Mark Duke
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Robert Spivey v. Joseph Wilson, et al
as 19-40885
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH WILSON, Individually, MARK DUKE, Transportation Officer (Individually), CHADRICK S. CLARK, Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL SPIVEY
Robert Spivey v. Joseph Wilson, et al
as 18-40007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL SPIVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH WILSON, Warden, individually and in his official capacity, CHADRICK S. CLARK, Lieutenant, individually and in his official capacity, MARK DUKE, Transportation Officer, individually and in his official capacity and others
Moten v. Duke et al
as 5:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Robert J Moten
Defendant:
Mark Duke and Steven Bobo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2016cv01888
Plaintiff:
Mark Duke
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and EMS Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
