Cases 11 - 20 of 55
McCollum v. Pries et al
as 1:2022cv01710
Plaintiff:
Johnnie McCollum
Defendant:
Michael H.W. Pries, George P. Hartwick, Chad Saylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NATIONAL RETAIL SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RETAIL SYSTEMS, INC. and KEYSTONE FREIGHT CORPORATION
Defendant:
MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
THE ESTATE OF DANNY VALENTINE-SHABAZZ v. FLYNN et al
as 2:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF DANNY VALENTINE-SHABAZZ
Defendant:
JEFF FLYNN, ROBERT BUCCINI, CHRIS BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE
as 2:2021cv00950
Plaintiff:
MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEWTON v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv01770
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DEVON MARKELL NEWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DAILEY v. CREANY et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Defendant:
VINCE MARKEL, RICHARD BECK, FREDERICK CREANY and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE
as 5:2020cv02279
Plaintiff:
MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEALTH FLEET AMBULANCE, INC. v. MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv02250
Defendant:
MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
HEALTH FLEET AMBULANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAILEY v. BAZYLAK et al
as 2:2019cv01653
Respondent:
OFFICER VINCE MARKEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, MAYOR RICHARD BECK and others
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
