Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Roach v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 1:2021cv00726
Defendant:
Judge Wallace and Maryland Parole Commission
Plaintiff:
Etoyi A. Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young-Bey v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00771
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission and Jason Jones
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Maryland Parole Commission
as 1:2020cv03609
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hornberger v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 8:2020cv00786
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission and Maryland Division Of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Hornberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01359
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Partlow v. Maryland Parole and Probation et al
as 1:2019cv01152
Plaintiff:
Tavon Jamaal Partlow, Sr.
Defendant:
State Attorney General and Maryland Parole and Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harvey v. Maryland Parole & Probation et al
as 1:2019cv01051
Plaintiff:
Kevin Renard Harvey, II
Defendant:
State Attorney General, Laura Y. Armstead and Maryland Parole & Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03836
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamilton v. State of Maryland City of Hagerstown Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2018cv03015
Defendant:
Jorge E. Baez, Board of Commissioners, State of Maryland City of Hagerstown, Hagerstown City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Hamilton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Young-Bey v. Young et al
as 1:2017cv03585
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M Young-Bey
Defendant:
Jay Young, David Blumberg and Maryland Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
