Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Matos-Ramirez v. Northampton County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv02976
Plaintiff:
Genesis Matos-Ramirez
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL and St. Luke's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATOS v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC et al
as 5:2021cv02751
Defendant:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE t/a PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE BERKS COUNTY, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC and DOE DESIGNEES 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA MATOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATOS v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC et al
as 2:2021cv02751
Defendant:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE t/a PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE BERKS COUNTY, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC and DOE DESIGNEES 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA MATOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matos-Ramirez v. Northampton County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01026
Defendant:
St. Luke's Hospital and Northampton County Jail
Plaintiff:
Genesis Matos-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BLEWITT v. LINK et al
as 2:2019cv05003
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK and JOANNA MATOS
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BLEWITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELEZ v. WALCZAK et al
as 2:2019cv02915
Plaintiff:
JUAN MATOS VELEZ
Defendant:
GREG WALCZAK and MERIDIAN CONTRACTORS AND CONSULTANTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ZACK v. MATOS
as 5:2019cv01834
Defendant:
FRANCIS MATOS
Plaintiff:
CHERYL LEE ZACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAMIREZ v. SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS et al
as 5:2019cv01295
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, COM OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
GENESIS MATOS RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MATOS v. COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv03039
Defendant:
COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ARNALDO MATOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
