Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Houston v. Howell et al
as 2:2019cv01371
Plaintiff:
Matthew Houston
Defendant:
Childers Hernandes, Casa Grande, James Dzurenada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01360
Respondent:
Jerry Howell, Dwayne Deal and James Dzurenda
Petitioner:
Matthew Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOUSTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF LAWS et al
as 2:2017cv02752
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF LAWS, PENNSYLVANIA, D.A. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HOUSTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2015cv06517
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOUSTON v. DHS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES/TANYA BETANCOURT et al
as 2:2015cv03377
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
DHS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES/TANYA BETANCOURT, CHILD ADVOCACY and WOMAN CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOUSTON v. BROSNAN et al
as 2:2015cv03376
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
JOY BROSNAN, NOWELLE, SHARON HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOUSTON v. ORAL SURGERY CONSULTANTS OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv03367
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
ORAL SURGERY CONSULTANTS OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthew Houston v. DE County Probation & Parole, et al
as 14-2743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY PROBATION & PAROLE OFFICE
Defendant - Appellee:
PROBATION OFFICER JOY BROSNAN and SUPERVISOR NOWELL
HOUSTON v. DHS et al
as 2:2014cv02770
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
DHS, TANYA BETANCOURT and CHILD ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2014cv02735
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MICHAEL MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
