Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Malerich v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00437
Defendant:
Michael Zenk, J Rodman, Oscar Martinez, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Malerich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLuna v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony DeLuna
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Martinez Jr, Former Sheriff John Buncich, Former Assistant Deputy Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lunsford Heth v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Lunsford Heth
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Martinez, Assistant Warden Nearly, Correctional Officer Mattingly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTINGLY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04708
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTINGLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HEAD-MATTINGLY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00572
Petitioner:
BRETT A. HEAD-MATTINGLY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
MATTINGLY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00448
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA A. MATTINGLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ZAVODNIK et al v. JOVEN et al
as 1:2016cv00626
Defendant:
JAMES JOVEN and KIM D. MATTINGLY
Plaintiff:
GERSH ZAVODNIK and TATIANA ZAVODNIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTINGLY v. BERTRAM
as 4:2015cv00177
Defendant:
BEN BERTRAM
Plaintiff:
SHAUN MATTHEW MATTINGLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
