Cases 11 - 20 of 99
McMahon v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00114
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Terry McMahon
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stainback, Jr. v. Diveley et al
as 3:2022cv03245
Plaintiff:
Charlie Stainback, Jr
Defendant:
Roger Diveley, John McMahon, Rebecca Witt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCauley v. Snyder et al
as 2:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
Timothy McCauley
Defendant:
R Snyder, . Spence, Andrea Bergstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01198
Plaintiff:
Scott McMahon
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, "Jane" Ellinger, "Jane" King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. City of Beardstown et al
as 3:2021cv03271
Plaintiff:
Lisa McMahon
Defendant:
City of Beardstown and Ian Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gist-Holden et al v. Goote et al
as 1:2021cv04169
Plaintiff:
Hailey Gist-Holden, Briana White and Johnnie Holden
Defendant:
Christopher Goote, Bryan, Kevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Meyer et al
as 3:2021cv03129
Defendant:
Macoupin County 7th Judicial Circuit Court, John McMahon, Joshua A Meyer and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Christopher Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahon v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
as 1:2021cv01258
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers Inc.
Plaintiff:
Victoria McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMahon v. Signet Jewelers Limited
as 1:2021cv01029
Defendant:
Signet Jewelers Limited
Plaintiff:
Victoria McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenzo SA v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv07389
Plaintiff:
Kenzo SA
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", justvero.com, YT Baby Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
