Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Thomas v. Webster County Detention Center et al
as 4:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
James Richard Thomas
Defendant:
Webster County Detention Center, Terry Elder and Webster County Detention Center Medical Department Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Kenton County Detention Center Medical Staff et al
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
James Richard Thomas
Defendant:
Kenton County Detention Center Medical Staff, Terry Carl, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard et al v. White et al
as 5:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard, Ricky Campbell and Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Randy White, Medical Department, LaDonna Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawks v. Does et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
Alfred Wayne Hawks
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does, Kentucky State Reformatory Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamble v. Campbell County Detention Center "Jail" et al
as 2:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gary Cecil Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Campbell County Detention Center "Jail" and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ray v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Ray
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Marion Adjustment Center, Kentucky State Reformatory Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Lee Adjustment Center Medical Department et al
as 5:2007cv00091
Plaintiff:
Donald Hyatt
Defendant:
Lee Adjustment Center Medical Department and Glen Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. CCA-LAC Medical Dept. et al
as 5:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mike Thompson
Defendant:
CCA-LAC Medical Dept., CCA-LAC Medical Dept., Vermont Department of Correction Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
