Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 769
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-297
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS and MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant: GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., WELLS FARGO & CO. and others
Defendant / Appellant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC and others
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED v. OMALLEY et al
as 2:2023cv04642
Defendant: HEATHER OMALLEY, JOHN C SCHOTT, JULINDA HOZHA and others
Plaintiff: MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Tera Group, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.
as 24-135
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERA GROUP, INC., TERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and TERAEXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: CITIGROUP, INC., CITIBANK, N.A., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. and others
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-81
Petitioner: PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND OF CHICAGO, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
Respondent: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Manning v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
as 6:2023cv00475
Plaintiff: Author J. Manning, Jr.
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Roberts v. Bloom Energy Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02935
Plaintiff: Elissa M. Roberts, James Everett Hunt, Juan Rodriguez and others
Defendant: Scott Sandell, Mary A. Ayotte, Eddy Zervigon and others
Petitioner: Cecil W. Forsberg and Ronald M. Kruse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01608
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: The City of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia and San Diego Association of Governments
Consolidated Defendant: Fifth Third Securities, Inc., BMO Financial Corp., BMO Financial Group and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06221
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System, Orange County Employees Retirement System, Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Association and others
Interested Party: Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC and Two Sigma Investments, LP
Petitioner: SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd., SL-x Technology UK Ltd. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Deutsche Bank AG and Joseph Santoro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
In re: NIO, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 23-1190
Petitioner: NIO Inc., Bin Li, Louis T. Hsieh and others
Respondent: Jonathan Tan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Eva Huang
Gold v. US Bancorp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff: Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?