Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Amos et al
as 4:2018cv03920
Defendant:
CBS Corporation and Jesse David Amos
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Civil Rights Project et al
as 4:2018cv03551
Defendant:
Civil Rights Project, 7031 Koll Center, US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Lord of the Streets Raymond E Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parkerson v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County ("Metro")
as 4:2018cv02520
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County ("Metro")
Plaintiff:
James Paul Parkerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randle v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County
as 4:2018cv01770
Plaintiff:
Hubert Randle
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Whiting v. Metropolitan Transit Authority et al
as 4:2018cv00447
Plaintiff:
Kevin Whiting
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority and Vera Bumpers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiteing v. Metropolitan Transit Authority et al
as 6:2017cv00684
Plaintiff:
Keith Whiteing
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority and Vera Bumpers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County et al
as 4:2017cv01697
Plaintiff:
Bernitta Barrett
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County and Harlin Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Lambert et al
as 4:2017mc00681
Plaintiff:
David L. Thorne
Defendant:
Thomas C. Lambert and Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (METRO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
