Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Morrison v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00445
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. SMITH
Defendant:
STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. , JOHN D. LAPEY , MICHAEL P. HALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Podgorski v. Egan
as 3:2017cv00501
Plaintiff:
Paul G Podgorski
Defendant:
Michael P. Egan
Movant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. , Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 2:17-CV-7-F.
as 4:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C., Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
American Contractors Indemnity Company v. H&L Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
American Contractors Indemnity Company
Defendant:
H&L Technologies, Inc., H&L Asset Holding, Inc., Eugene L. Presley and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2016mc00032
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. WILLIAMS
Armstrong v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
Arthur Orlandus Armstrong
Defendant:
B. K. Jones , J. E. Moore , W. L. Everett, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
McPhail et al v. Felton et al
as 4:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Brittany McPhail and Jimmy McPhail
Defendant:
David Felton , Justin Gorman , Brad Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Brittany McPhail and Jimmy McPhail
Defendant:
David Felton, Justin Gorman, Brad Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
