Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Whitaker v. Norfolk Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Whitaker
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff's Office, Sheriff McCabe, Lt. Col. Borom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. United States of America
as 6:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Evelyn L. Middleton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Reynolds v. Middleton
as 3:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Reynolds
Defendant:
Douglas A. Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Middleton v. Oskey et al
as 1:2012cv01133
Plaintiff:
Eliza Middleton
Defendant:
Robert Dallas Oskey and Telforward, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Middleton v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Evelyn L. Middleton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Middleton v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Evelyn L. Middleton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Middleton v. Zych
as 7:2012cv00266
Petitioner:
Sylvester Middleton, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Zych
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Middleton v. United States Of America
as 6:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Evelyn L. Middleton
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Springer v. Brown #1 et al
as 7:2012cv00158
Defendant:
C/O Brown #1, C/O Brown #2, Q.M.H.P. Bullion and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackstreet Entertainment, Inc. et al v. Middleton et al
as 2:2011cv00644
Plaintiff:
Blackstreet Entertainment, Inc. , Edward (Teddy) Theodore Riley and Chauncey Hannibal
Defendant:
Mark Middleton and Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
