Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Milligan et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02094
Plaintiff:
Ella Milligan and Hattie Bradshaw
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Mohr et al
as 3:2014cv02105
Plaintiff:
Dante' D. Gordon
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Gary Croft, Margaret Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milligan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv01094
Plaintiff:
Randall David Milligan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Beightler et al
as 3:2013cv02608
Plaintiff:
Herbert Anderson
Defendant:
M. Beightler, Jason Bunting, Steve Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milligan et al v DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21081
Plaintiff:
Lyall J. Milligan, Sr. and Nelly M. Milligan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milligan et al v. DePuy Inc et al
as 1:2012dp21759
Plaintiff:
Gloria D. Milligan and Tommy J. Milligan
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeAmiches v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv01373
Plaintiff:
James DeAmiches
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Gary Morh, Former Director of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolling v. Milligan et al
as 1:2012cv01007
Petitioner:
Michael Rolling
Respondent:
Tim Milligan and Jason Bunting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gabel v. Bunting et al
as 3:2011cv02404
Plaintiff:
Kermit Gabel
Defendant:
Jason Bunting, Tim Milligan, Constance Mosher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
