Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Rodriguez v. Doe et al
as 3:2012cv00663
Plaintiff:
Isidoro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jane Doe , John Doe , Cynthia D. Kinser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Magano v. Mims et al
as 3:2010cv00525
Petitioner:
Gerald Steven Magano
Respondent:
William C. Mims and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harbison v. Cuccinelli et al
as 3:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
Paul Renfro Harbison, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II , Bobby S. Mims, Senior Judge Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. Mims et al
as 2:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Hernandez
Defendant:
Bill Mims and J. Apperson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commonwealth of Virginia et al., v. SupportKids Services, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia , William C. Mims and Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement
Defendant:
SupportKids Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00601
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Joseph v. Lester et al
as 1:2009cv01156
Petitioner:
Leroy E. Joseph
Respondent:
Layton Lester and William C. Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minns v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 2:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
E. George Minns
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Bill Mims, William (Bill) Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nellson v. Mims et al
as 1:2009cv00436
Petitioner:
Edward Nellson
Respondent:
Bill Mims and T. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
