Cases 11 - 20 of 22
National Parks Conserv. Assoc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 12-3481
Petitioner:
National Parks Conservation Association, Voyagers National Park Association, Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator
National Parks Conservation v. EPA, et al
as 12-2910
Petitioner:
National Parks Conservation Association, Voyageurs National Park Association, Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Gulf Restoration Network et al v. Jackson et al
as 2:2012cv00677
Plaintiff:
Gulf Restoration Network , Missouri Coalition for the Environment , Iowa Environmental Council and others
Defendant:
Lisa P. Jackson and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Jackson et al
as 1:2012cv01848
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. , Missouri Coalition for the Environment , Gulf Restoration Network and others
Defendant:
Lisa P. Jackson and The United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 0:2010cv02178
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy , Sierra Club and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Kent Connaughton and James Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA v. NORTON et al
as 1:2002cv02057
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA and STATE OF MISSOURI
Defendant:
JOHN W. KEYS , MARYANNE C. BACH , DENNIS E. BREITZMAN and others
Intervenor_defendant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Amicu:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA , SOUTH DAKOTA WILDLIFE FEDERATION , MINNESOTA CONSERVATION FEDERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Sierra Club et al v. Clinton et al
as 0:2009cv02622
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, Sierra Club, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton, James Steinberg and others
Intervenor:
Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Sierra Club et al v. Clinton et al
as 3:2009cv04086
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, Sierra Club, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Hillary Clinton, James Steinberg, United States Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States v. Northshore Mining Co.
as 08-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, State of Wisconsin, Save Lake Superior Association and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Michigan and City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellee:
Northshore Mining Company
Intervenor Defendant:
County of Lake, Minnesota, Northeastern Minnesota Development Association, Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce and others
United States v. Northshore Mining Co.
as 08-1533
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, State of Wisconsin and Save Lake Superior Association
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Minnesota and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Michigan and City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellee:
Northshore Mining Company
Intervenor Defendant:
County of Lake, Minnesota, Northeastern Minnesota Development Association, Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
