Cases 11 - 20 of 617
McGaughy v. Fordice et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodricus McGaughy
Defendant:
Kirk Fordice, Attorney General Mike Moore, Board of Supervisors Lee County 1996-1998 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Moore et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dymon Moore and Gassey Williams
Defendant:
The City of Columbus and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights Act
Moore v. MS State IRS et al
as 3:2023cv03176
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
MS State IRS and DOJ etc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hampton v. Moore
as 3:2023cv03170
Plaintiff:
Cedrick R. Hampton
Defendant:
Sheriff James Moore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Georgia Moore
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thornton et al v. South Panola School District et al
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Robert Thornton and Taneshia Young
Defendant:
South Panola School District, Ruby Moore and Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ronald Moore
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
