Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Thompson v. Vrba et al
as 4:2015cv00306
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Thompson
Defendant:
Tiffany Vrba, Shawn Howard, Bob Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. City of Dubuque, Iowa et al
as 2:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Potter
Defendant:
City of Dubuque, Iowa and Jay Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hafner et al v. City of Dubuque, Iowa et al
as 2:2015cv01002
Plaintiff:
Angela Hafner and Suzanne Potter
Defendant:
City of Dubuque, Iowa, Jay Murray and Nick Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driesen v. Smith et al
as 5:2013cv04037
Plaintiff:
Jay Driesen
Defendant:
Michael J Smith, Margaret A Smith, Steven G Haugaard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steen et al v. Murray et al.,
as 1:2012cv00031
Defendant:
Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP. , Robert Murray and Ryan Boe
Plaintiff:
Richard Steen and Lloydene Steen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Steen et al v. Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP. et al
as 4:2012cv00531
Defendant:
Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP. , Robert Murray and Ryan Boe
Plaintiff:
Richard Steen and Lloydene Steen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steen et al v. Murray et al
as 1:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Richard Steen and Lloydene Steen
Defendant:
Robert Murray, Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP. and Ryan Boe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burton v. Lund et al
as 4:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zachary Burton
Defendant:
Mark Lund, Tonya Baldwin, Any and All Unnamed Persons Involved Working at CCF/DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v Rope
as 4:2009cv00523
Plaintiff:
Craig Allen Murray
Defendant:
Randy Rope, Brad Richards, Steve Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
